TRIP TO ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, NEVADA & UTAH, COLORADO
Recent Trip to These States: 3/1/00
ARIZONA
Arizona seems to be doing a fair job with their roadside hardware. Although we didn’t see many ET 2000’s at least we didn’t see any blunt end guardrails.
CALIFORNIA
Cal Trans Socked for $5.9M
Improper Rail Installation Led to Severe Injuries in Crash
Feb. 4th, 2002 Randy Stewart
From: "California Jury Verdicts Weekly" Vol. 1 Issue 5
An Alameda County jury awarded $5.9 million to a 47 year-old unemployed women whose leg was amputated after her vehicle went off the roadway and crashed into a guardrail over Castro Valley Boulevard.
Facts: On June 26th, 1998 Sabrina Bauman was driving a Datsun 280Z on the on-ramp to Interstate 580 from Foothill Boulevard. As she was driving, a cup of hot chocolate spilled, causing her to drive off the on left side of the on-ramp. As she tried to re enter the roadway, she was looking over her right shoulder when she struck a guardrail on the bridge that crosses over the boulevard.
She claimed that the guardrail speared through her vehicle, smashing her left foot and cutting off her right leg. She argued that had the guardrail been properly installed, she would have been involved only in a minor non injury collision. The plaintiff's counsel determined that the guardrail she struck had been improperly installed in or about 1989. In 1980 , the Federal Government had complained to the director of the California State Department of Transportation (Cal Trans) about the same deficiencies as those in this guardrail, the plaintiff reported. Cal Trans countered the plaintiff's claims by maintaining that the guardrail was properly installed. It also claimed that the plaintiff would have suffered the same injuries regardless of the guardrail installation because of the way she allegedly struck the rail.
Injuries: The plaintiff's right leg was cut off at the knee. At the hospital, her stump was amputated at the mid-thigh due to the severe damage to the bones and muscles.
Verdict: The jury found that Cal Trans was 100% at fault for the plaintiff's injuries. The defendants have filed a motion for a new trial.
3/2/02 Update: Cal Trans has lost there motion for a new trial and it appears it will be difficult for them to overcome this.
This should serve notice to all the States and to the Federal Highway Administration that they will need to fix thousands of guardrails and other roadside hazards across the country. Kansas still has thousands of blunt end guardrails that their own Sec. of Transportation has signed a memorandum saying they had to be replaced years ago.
Feb. 2000--We were told that California would have every blunt end off of their highways by 2000. We saw hundreds of the blunt end (stand up end) on the highways in southern and central parts of the state. Most of these are at least anchored but should still be replaced. Many of the installations of gating type terminals are on a slope where there is no room for recovery when hit. On I-15 near the I-40 interchange, there were tapered concrete barriers. It looked like if they were hit on the end, they would vault a car in the air, often times right into a bridge pillar they were meant to protect.
NEVADA & UTAH
We were only on I-15 in Nevada. At mm15 they had a tapered concrete barrier that looked like it would vault a car right into the bridge pillar. There were many examples of these in Nevada and Utah. In Utah they were putting Sentre’s on concrete barriers with no run of guardrail that didn’t look like they would work in our opinion.
COLORADO
Colorado continues to be complacent with their roadside hardware. On I-70 we mostly saw BCT’s on rusted guardrail. In the cases where they have updated their terminals, it is our opinion that they have chosen to use hardware that isn’t the best. They are using the slotted rail instead of the ET-2000. We have been informed on 12/8/00 that Colorado has adopted the Slotted Rail Terminal and the ET-2000. We wish they would only use the safer ET-2000 and save more lives. We do not have the statistics on the slotted Rail Terminal but they will most likely have a higher death and injury rate than the ET-2000. This save lives not money!!!